| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1308138091.15315.50.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:41:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
shaohua.li@...el.com, alex.shi@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
paulmck <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching
anon_vma->lock to mutex
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 12:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 12:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 17:29 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > > MOSBENCH test suite.
> >
> > Argh, I'm trying to get this thing to run, but its all snake poo..
> >
> > /me takes up a heavy club and goes snake hunting, should make a pretty
> > hat or something.
>
> Sweet, I've got meself a snake-skin hat!
>
> The first thing that stood out when running it was:
>
> 31694 root 20 0 26660 1460 1212 S 17.5 0.0 0:01.97 exim
> 7 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 12.7 0.0 0:06.14 rcuc0
> 24 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:04.15 rcuc3
> 34 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:04.10 rcuc5
> 39 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:06.38 rcuc6
> 44 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:04.53 rcuc7
> 49 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:04.11 rcuc8
> 79 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:03.91 rcuc14
> 89 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:03.90 rcuc16
> 110 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:03.90 rcuc20
> 120 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 11.7 0.0 0:03.82 rcuc22
> 13 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:04.37 rcuc1
> 19 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:04.19 rcuc2
> 29 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:04.12 rcuc4
> 54 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:04.11 rcuc9
> 59 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:04.40 rcuc10
> 64 root -2 19 0 0 0 R 10.7 0.0 0:04.17 rcuc11
> 69 root -2 19 0 0 0 R 10.7 0.0 0:04.23 rcuc12
> 84 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:03.90 rcuc15
> 95 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:03.99 rcuc17
> 100 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:03.88 rcuc18
> 105 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:04.14 rcuc19
> 125 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 10.7 0.0 0:03.79 rcuc23
> 74 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 9.7 0.0 0:04.33 rcuc13
> 115 root -2 19 0 0 0 R 9.7 0.0 0:03.82 rcuc21
>
> Which is an impressive amount of RCU usage..
FWIW, Alex Shi's patch:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1308029185.15392.147.camel@sli10-conroe
Improves the situation to:
3745 root 20 0 26664 1460 1212 S 18.5 0.0 0:01.28 exim
39 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 4.9 0.0 0:02.83 rcuc6
105 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 4.9 0.0 0:02.79 rcuc19
7 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 3.9 0.0 0:02.70 rcuc0
13 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 3.9 0.0 0:02.54 rcuc1
19 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 3.9 0.0 0:02.76 rcuc2
24 root -2 19 0 0 0 S 3.9 0.0 0:02.75 rcuc3
...
And throughput increases like:
-tip 260.092 messages/sec/core
-tip+sirq-rcu 271.078 messages/sec/core
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists