[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1106151725460.11814@ionos>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: don't use flush_scheduled_work() in IRQ affinity
notifiers
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > cd7eab44e9 (genirq: Add IRQ affinity notifiers) added use of
> > flush_scheduled_work() which is being deprecated. Add a dedicated
> > workqueue and flush it instead of flushing system-wide workqueue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> > ---
> > I'm planning on marking flush_scheduled_work() deprecated in
> > linux-next soonish. It would be great if this patch (or something
> > else which removes flush_scheduled_work() call somehow) can be
> > included in linux-next.
>
> Ooh, right, only compile & boot tested. Don't have anything which
> makes use of affinity notifier.
Ben?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists