linux-kernel - Re: [PWM v9 0/3] Implement a generic PWM framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTikD66EheEQem82yPocCs6Bzqoa4kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:33:00 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PWM v9 0/3] Implement a generic PWM framework

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 23:59, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> This patch series contains the ninth attempt at implementation of a
> generic PWM device interface framework.  Think gpiolib, but for
> devices and pseudo-devices that generate pulse-wave-modulated outputs.

i was made aware of the existing code in linux/pwm.h.  seems that this
framework should absorb that since there are already drivers built on
top of it (i see a backlight, led, and input driver), and we dont want
two frameworks doing exactly the same thing.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/