[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik5TXXBx6tnYiKNs075n9xHq4_zSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:54:13 -0500
From: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@...ayonlinux.org>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@...fax.org.uk>,
Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kreijack@...ero.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Remove all sysfs entries
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Hugo Mills <hugo@...fax.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Seems that currently none of the sysfs are created any more, so just
>> remove sysfs support entirely.
>>
>> Fixes compiling warnings in 3.0rc3
>
> I would actually like to retain sysfs support -- the current
> entries may not be used (or useful, or in the right place, or even
> visible these days), but there's plenty of things that could and
> should go in sysfs from btrfs.
>
> So, please do remove the unwanted/unused file entries, but could
> you leave the sysfs file itself, and the (limited) bits that create
> the btrfs subdir? Otherwise, I'm going to be putting it all back in
> this weekend when I get the time to revisit Goffredo's old sysfs
> patch...
>
> Thanks,
> Hugo.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>
>>
>> --
>
> (I think this should be three - signs, not two: my signature-
> cropping script removed the whole patch)
>
I'm not sure if Goffredo is following this thread, but I think you'll
need a missing patch to provide a fs/btrfs/sysfs.h file in order to
use his sysfs patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists