[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1308159607.7499.36.camel@beton>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:40:07 -0700
From: Max Asbock <masbock@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Max Asbock <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, kay.sievers@...y.org,
virtuoso@...nd.org, johnstul <johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timerfd: really wake up processes when timer is
cancelled on clock change
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:53:45 -0700 Max Asbock <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Do you think this fix should be backported into -stable kernels? If so
> (or if not), why?
>
The feature this patch fixes has been introduced in 3.0, therefore there
is no need for a packport to stable kernels.
- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists