linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:21:07 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@...ox.ru>,
	x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...fiish.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 06/14/11 17:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:06:02 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>>>
>>> Some files use GPIOF_ macros but don't include the header file
>>> for them.  These macros are being moved to <linux/gpio.h>, so add
>>> includes for <linux/gpio.h> where needed.
>>
>> Shouldn't these patches be in the other order to avoid bisection problems?
>
> Hm, I suppose so.
>
> Grant, can you apply these with patch 2/2 first or do I need to resend
> the patches?

You don't need to resend.  I'll apply them in the correct order.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/