| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BANLkTikJ8v-hhvfApJm4Pz0w7-ttiTYADw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:21:07 -0600 From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@...ox.ru>, x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...fiish.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote: > On 06/14/11 17:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Randy, >> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:06:02 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> >>> >>> Some files use GPIOF_ macros but don't include the header file >>> for them. These macros are being moved to <linux/gpio.h>, so add >>> includes for <linux/gpio.h> where needed. >> >> Shouldn't these patches be in the other order to avoid bisection problems? > > Hm, I suppose so. > > Grant, can you apply these with patch 2/2 first or do I need to resend > the patches? You don't need to resend. I'll apply them in the correct order. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists