linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq bug fixes (stable/cpufreq.bugfixes) for 3.0 (or 3.1).

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110615211319.GB27438@dumpdata.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:13:19 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq bug fixes (stable/cpufreq.bugfixes) for 3.0 (or
 3.1).

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:26:30PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:01:58PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>  > The two patches attached make the cpufreq and powernowk8 driver more robust on
>  > badly behaving machines (or hypervisors not passing through proper rmsdr calls).
> 
> I applied these (after fixing up the change of filename in the powernow driver)
> I'll send Linus a pull req to make sure these get into 3.0 later.

Thank you. Sorry about missing the directory move and you having to do extra legwork.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/