[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1308186508.17300.423.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:28 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching
anon_vma->lock to mutex
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:37 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:12 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Thanks to Andi for providing the info. We've used this workaround in
> > our testing so it will not mask true kernel scaling bottlenecks.
>
>
> http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/39-2.txt.bz2
> http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/tip-2.txt.bz2
>
> tip+sirq+linus is still slightly faster than .39 here, although removing
> that sysconf() wreckage closed the gap considerably (needing to know the
> number of cpus to optimize locking sounds like a trainwreck all of its
> own, needing it _that_ often instead of just once at startup is even
> worse).
>
Peter,
Fengguang's readahead fixes for tmpfs removed another bottleneck before
anon_vma->lock become dominant. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/26/143)
We've found this issue when we were testing exim earlier.
It was merged in 3.0-rc2 but not in plain 2.6.39. So with this patch on
2.6.39 we should get better comparison with 3.0-rc2.
Thanks.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists