linux-kernel - [28/85] loop: handle on-demand devices correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:28:24 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: [28/85] loop: handle on-demand devices correctly

2.6.33-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>

commit a1c15c59feee36267c43142a41152fbf7402afb6 upstream.

When finding or allocating a loop device, loop_probe() did not take
partition numbers into account so that it can result to a different
device. Consider following example:

$ sudo modprobe loop max_part=15
$ ls -l /dev/loop*
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   0 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop0
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  16 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop1
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  32 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  48 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop3
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  64 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop4
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  80 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop5
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  96 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop6
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7, 112 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop7
$ sudo mknod /dev/loop8 b 7 128
$ sudo losetup /dev/loop8 ~/temp/disk-with-3-parts.img
$ sudo losetup -a
/dev/loop128: [0805]:278201 (/home/namhyung/temp/disk-with-3-parts.img)
$ ls -l /dev/loop*
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,    0 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop0
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   16 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop1
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7, 2048 2011-05-24 22:18 /dev/loop128
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7, 2049 2011-05-24 22:18 /dev/loop128p1
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7, 2050 2011-05-24 22:18 /dev/loop128p2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7, 2051 2011-05-24 22:18 /dev/loop128p3
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   32 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   48 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop3
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   64 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop4
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   80 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop5
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,   96 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop6
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 7,  112 2011-05-24 22:16 /dev/loop7
brw-r--r-- 1 root root 7,  128 2011-05-24 22:17 /dev/loop8

After this patch, /dev/loop8 - instead of /dev/loop128 - was
accessed correctly.

In addition, 'range' passed to blk_register_region() should
include all range of dev_t that LOOP_MAJOR can address. It does
not need to be limited by partition numbers unless 'max_loop'
param was specified.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t
 	struct kobject *kobj;
 
 	mutex_lock(&loop_devices_mutex);
-	lo = loop_init_one(dev & MINORMASK);
+	lo = loop_init_one(MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
 	kobj = lo ? get_disk(lo->lo_disk) : ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_devices_mutex);
 
@@ -1611,10 +1611,10 @@ static int __init loop_init(void)
 
 	if (max_loop) {
 		nr = max_loop;
-		range = max_loop;
+		range = max_loop << part_shift;
 	} else {
 		nr = 8;
-		range = 1UL << (MINORBITS - part_shift);
+		range = 1UL << MINORBITS;
 	}
 
 	if (register_blkdev(LOOP_MAJOR, "loop"))
@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ static void __exit loop_exit(void)
 	unsigned long range;
 	struct loop_device *lo, *next;
 
-	range = max_loop ? max_loop :  1UL << (MINORBITS - part_shift);
+	range = max_loop ? max_loop << part_shift : 1UL << MINORBITS;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(lo, next, &loop_devices, lo_list)
 		loop_del_one(lo);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/