linux-kernel - [69/89] ASoC: snd_soc_new_{mixer,mux,pga} make sure to use right

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110616000235.750771233@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:00:32 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [69/89] ASoC: snd_soc_new_{mixer,mux,pga} make sure to use right

2.6.39-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
 DAPM context

From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>

commit 4b80b8c2eee5282dab57f094fd3893c0c09f750c upstream.

Currently it is possible that snd_soc_new_{mixer,mux,pga} is called with a
DAPM context not matching the widgets context. This can lead to a wrong
prefix_len calculation, which will result in undefined behaviour. To avoid
this always use the DAPM context from the widget itself.

Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 sound/soc/soc-dapm.c |   17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -362,9 +362,9 @@ static int dapm_update_bits(struct snd_s
 }
 
 /* create new dapm mixer control */
-static int dapm_new_mixer(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
-	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w)
+static int dapm_new_mixer(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w)
 {
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = w->dapm;
 	int i, ret = 0;
 	size_t name_len, prefix_len;
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_path *path;
@@ -443,9 +443,9 @@ static int dapm_new_mixer(struct snd_soc
 }
 
 /* create new dapm mux control */
-static int dapm_new_mux(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
-	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w)
+static int dapm_new_mux(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w)
 {
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = w->dapm;
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_path *path = NULL;
 	struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol;
 	struct snd_card *card = dapm->card->snd_card;
@@ -490,8 +490,7 @@ err:
 }
 
 /* create new dapm volume control */
-static int dapm_new_pga(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
-	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w)
+static int dapm_new_pga(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w)
 {
 	if (w->num_kcontrols)
 		dev_err(w->dapm->dev,
@@ -1735,13 +1734,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets(struct snd_
 		case snd_soc_dapm_mixer:
 		case snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl:
 			w->power_check = dapm_generic_check_power;
-			dapm_new_mixer(dapm, w);
+			dapm_new_mixer(w);
 			break;
 		case snd_soc_dapm_mux:
 		case snd_soc_dapm_virt_mux:
 		case snd_soc_dapm_value_mux:
 			w->power_check = dapm_generic_check_power;
-			dapm_new_mux(dapm, w);
+			dapm_new_mux(w);
 			break;
 		case snd_soc_dapm_adc:
 		case snd_soc_dapm_aif_out:
@@ -1754,7 +1753,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets(struct snd_
 		case snd_soc_dapm_pga:
 		case snd_soc_dapm_out_drv:
 			w->power_check = dapm_generic_check_power;
-			dapm_new_pga(dapm, w);
+			dapm_new_pga(w);
 			break;
 		case snd_soc_dapm_input:
 		case snd_soc_dapm_output:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/