linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:33:16 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi124@...il.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Asias He <asias.hejun@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool v2

Hi Ingo,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>  - executing AIO in the vcpu thread eats up precious vcpu execution
>   time: combined QCOW2 throughput would be limited by a single
>   core's performance, and any time spent on QCOW2 processing would
>   not be spent running the guest CPU. (In such a model we certainly
>   couldnt do more intelligent, CPU-intense storage solutions like on
>   the fly compress/decompress of QCOW2 data.)

Most image formats have optional on-the-fly compression/decompression
so we'd need to keep the current I/O thread scheme anyway.

> I'd only consider KAIO it if it provides some *real* measurable
> performance advantage of at least 10% in some important usecase.
> A few percent probably wouldnt be worth it.

I've only been following AIO kernel development from the sidelines but
I really haven't seen any reports of significant gains over
read()/write() from a thread pool. Are there any such reports?

                          Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/