[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1308223158.8230.66.camel@bahia.local>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:19:18 +0200
From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge@...lyn.com,
daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, ebiederm@...ssion.com, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce ActivePid: in /proc/self/status (v2, was
Vpid:)
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:03 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Forgot to ask,
>
> On 06/15, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >
> > The need arises in the LXC community when one wants to send a signal from
> > the host (aka. init_pid_ns context) to a container process for which one
> > only knows the pid inside the container.
>
> I am just curious, why do you need this?
>
Because some LXC users run partially isolated containers (AKA.
application containers started with the lxc-execute command). Some of
the user code runs outside the container and some inside. Since
lxc-execute uses CLONE_NEWPID, it's difficult for the external code to
relate a pid generated inside the container with a task. There are
regular requests on lxc-users@ about this.
--
Gregory Kurz gkurz@...ibm.com
Software Engineer @ IBM/Meiosys http://www.ibm.com
Tel +33 (0)534 638 479 Fax +33 (0)561 400 420
"Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
Alan Moore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists