[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110616124452.GC2611@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:44:52 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] stop_machine: kill __stop_machine()
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 19:06 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > @@ -719,8 +719,7 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke_smp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > tpp.nparams = 1;
> > atomic_set(&stop_machine_first, 1);
> > wrote_text = 0;
> > - /* Use __stop_machine() because the caller already got online_cpus. */
> > - __stop_machine(stop_machine_text_poke, (void *)&tpp, cpu_online_mask);
> > + stop_machine(stop_machine_text_poke, (void *)&tpp, cpu_online_mask);
> > return addr;
> > }
>
> Please have a look at:
>
> ---
> commit d91309f69b7bdb64aeb30106fde8d18c5dd354b5
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Fri Feb 11 22:07:46 2011 +0100
>
> x86: Fix text_poke_smp_batch() deadlock
>
> Fix this deadlock - we are already holding the mutex:
Ah, right, I thought cpu_hotplug_begin() sets active_writer and then
returns with cpu_hotplug.lock released. Weird locking there.
Anyways, this one should be dropped then and I don't think it affects
the rest of the series much.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists