[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110616125256.GB19312@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:52:56 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge@...lyn.com,
daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, ebiederm@...ssion.com, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce ActivePid: in /proc/self/status (v2, was
Vpid:)
On 06/16, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:03 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Forgot to ask,
> >
> > On 06/15, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > >
> > > The need arises in the LXC community when one wants to send a signal from
> > > the host (aka. init_pid_ns context) to a container process for which one
> > > only knows the pid inside the container.
> >
> > I am just curious, why do you need this?
> >
>
> Because some LXC users run partially isolated containers (AKA.
> application containers started with the lxc-execute command). Some of
> the user code runs outside the container and some inside. Since
> lxc-execute uses CLONE_NEWPID, it's difficult for the external code to
> relate a pid generated inside the container with a task. There are
> regular requests on lxc-users@ about this.
Well, this doesn't answer my question ;) Why do you need to send the
signal into the sub-namespace, and how/why do you know the pid inside
the container.
OK, nevermind, I was just curious.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists