[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110616150811.GA15328@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:08:12 +0200
From: Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@...labs.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce ActivePid: in /proc/self/status (v2, was
Vpid:)
On 16/06/11 16:51 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/16, Louis Rilling wrote:
> >
> > On 16/06/11 15:00 +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > peeking into pid->numbers.
> >
> > It ends like open-coding an optimized version of task_pid_vnr(). If the
> > optimization is really important (I guess this depends on the depth of recursive
> > pid namespaces), it would be better to re-write task_pid_vnr().
>
> No, task_pid_vnr(p) is different, it should use the caller's namespace.
Damned, I read __task_pid_nr_ns() too quickly. Thanks for correcting me.
>
> Just in case, I agree there is no need to optimize this code. The simpler
> the better. I mentioned pid->numbers[pid->level] just to point that all
> we need is task_pid() itself, there are no subtle races which need the
> locking.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Louis
--
Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs
Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium
Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes
http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists