[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gisjr9ll0j.fsf@mx10.gouders.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:54:36 +0200
From: Dirk Gouders <gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [2.6.39] drm/i915: blank screen on Lenovo Ideapad U160
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> writes:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:49:11 +0200
> Dirk Gouders <gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de> wrote:
>
>> Some redundant information, but if I change one line at another place
>> in the i915 code (whithout the above modification) the result is more
>> satisfactory on my machine, because in that case the display even works
>> after I close and reopen the lid:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> index 927442a..ebb67ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int intel_bios_ssc_frequency(struct drm_device *dev,
>> case 4:
>> return alternate ? 100 : 96;
>> default:
>> - return alternate ? 100 : 120;
>> + return alternate ? 120 : 100;
>> }
>> }
>
> Does your machine also work if you set the lvds_use_ssc param to 0?
Yes, that works!
I undid all modifications, compiled the i915 driver as a module (I am
not sure if that is necessary) und used i915.lvds_use_ssc=0 as a
further bootparameter, I will attach the dmesg output.
Would you say "This problem was just a case of wrong parameter usage",
then?
Dirk
View attachment "dmesg.txt" of type "text/plain" (32877 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists