[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5740779.B2nyl9oMW4@barack>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:39:57 +0300
From: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lopez Cruz, Misael" <misael.lopez@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator
Hello Tejun,
On Thursday 16 June 2011 16:06:00 Ujfalusi, Peter wrote:
> > I suppose you meant alloc_workqueue()? :)
>
> Oh, yes. I mean that.
Just avoid another series...
I have looked at the alloc_workqueue, and I'm not really sure what parameters
should I use.
#define create_singlethread_workqueue(name) \
alloc_workqueue((name), WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1)
I would use something like this instead of create_singlethread_workqueue:
alloc_workqueue("twl6040-vibra", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 1);
Is this correct?
Thanks,
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists