[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DFB582E.7070909@ladisch.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:35:42 +0200
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: non-printable characters in /proc/interrupts
Toralf Förster wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote at 18:11:32
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:40:19 +0200 Toralf Förster wrote:
> > > I've wondering about this entry at my ThinkPad T400 (kernel 2.6.39.1):
> > > ...
> > > 44: 484163 55698 PCI-MSI-edge ahci
> > > 45: 750 1809 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> > > 46: 94 213 PCI-MSI-edge hda_intel
> > > 47: 44399 70713 PCI-MSI-edge l▒��@�E�
> > > 48: 71969 102457 PCI-MSI-edge iwlagn
> >
> > Is there any other info (like dmesg or boot log) that tells what
> > device/driver uses interrupt 47 ?
>
> I attached the dmesg output
> ahci 0000:00:1f.2: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X
> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X
> iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
> HDA Intel 0000:00:1b.0: irq 47 for MSI/MSI-X
> i915 0000:00:02.0: irq 48 for MSI/MSI-X
These interrupt numbers do not match; I'd guess that you rebooted and
that the drivers were initialized in a different order.
Anyway, it looks as if the i915 driver is the culprit.
A quick look into the DRM code shows that it uses dev->devname as
interrupt name, but that field might get freed by drm_setversion().
(Or I might be wrong; I don't have this hardware.)
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists