[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110617151236.GI2611@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:12:36 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: vda.linux@...glemail.com, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, bdonlan@...il.com,
pedro@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ptrace: implement TRAP_NOTIFY and use it for group
stop events
Hello, Oleg.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I already applied this series. But somehow I have the fuzzy feeling we
> can simplify JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY/JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP logic later. No, I can't
> explain what I mean ;)
Heh, yeah, please go ahead.
> One question,
>
> > @@ -1797,8 +1824,10 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info)
> > if (why == CLD_STOPPED && (current->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING))
> > gstop_done = task_participate_group_stop(current);
> >
> > - /* any trap clears pending STOP trap */
> > + /* any trap clears pending STOP trap, STOP trap clears NOTIFY */
> > task_clear_jobctl_pending(current, JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP);
> > + if (info && info->si_code >> 8 == PTRACE_EVENT_STOP)
> > + task_clear_jobctl_pending(current, JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY);
>
> OK, but can't we check why == CLD_STOPPED instead of PTRACE_EVENT_STOP?
Yeap, sure. The reason why I used PTRACE_EVENT_STOP was because
PTRACE_LISTEN needs the same test and it doesn't have access to @why.
Maybe it's better to create ptrace_is_trap_stop(si)?
> In fact, can't we move all code above under 'if (why == CLD_STOPPED)' ?
> JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP can't be set otherwise, no? I am almost sure I missed
> something though.
JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP should also be cleared on CLD_TRAPPED traps. ie. If
the ptracer does PTRACE_INTERRUPT and then wait(2) reports
PTRACE_EVENT_FORK, there won't be another PTRACE_EVENT_STOP.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists