[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTindmEA7NsaRjuukh1-oRCtVWpeuCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:28:25 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atomic: cleanup asm-generic atomic*.h inclusion
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 13:11, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On 6/16/11 11:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i'm not sure this doesnt break things. what tree exactly should i
>> apply this patch to to verify things ?
>
> I tested 3.0-rc2 + patch 1 + patch 2 + this patch.
not sure what those patches are, so i picked at random:
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] atomic: move atomic_add_unless to generic code
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:07:18 -0700
Message-Id: <1307491639-9864-2-git-send-email-asharma@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] atomic: use <linux/atomic.h>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:27:29 -0700
Message-Id: <1307381251-15729-1-git-send-email-asharma@...com>
but even after just these two, things fail because
include/asm-generic/atomic.h provides atomic_add_unless() already.
i'm guessing your patch 2/3 should have fixed that somehow since it
adds the func to linux/atomic.h.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists