[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110617174239.GG16236@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:42:39 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] VFS: Do (nearly) lockless generic_file_llseek
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2011 23:07:18 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So still need a lock, but can use a cheap local one.
> >
> > This patch implements this new scheme in generic_file_llseek.
> > I dropped generic_file_llseek_unlocked and changed all callers.
>
> What about default_llseek? If you change generic_file_llseek, you should
> probably change that, too.
That's used by a lot of drivers, and since I cannot audit them
all I chose to be conservative. not sure it's ever performance
critical anyways?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists