[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=idGOgMkBXF6p-Uo9ARAmgb1uR_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:25:21 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Make firmware drivers generally available
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 14:11, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:16, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> > It looks as if sigma.c doesn't actually belong into drivers/firmware.
>> > That directory is for code that lets the kernel access the firmware
>> > of the platform that the kernel itself runs on.
>>
>> -EMISSINGBETTERSUGGESTION
>
> I *knew* somebody would ask. :)
>
> "drivers/firmware" is the obvious name for both, but that makes
> it ambiguous. I'd suggest to split the two subsystems into
> "drivers/host-firmware" and "drivers/device-firmware".
i honestly dont see how this is better. the drivers/firmware/ isnt
exactly overflowing, and differentiating between the two modes doesnt
seem to gain us anything.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists