lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1308275405.9218.156.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:50:05 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: update cpupri for runqueue when its priority
 changes

On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 17:54 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> When the priority of runqueue changes, lower or higer, the info of cpupri
> should be updated, in cases such as pick_next_task_rt() and switched_to_rt().

Why?

We do the calculation on queuing and dequeuing the task, we only care
about the highest priority task that is on the queue, not what is
actually running.

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index 08e9374..9508168 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1158,6 +1158,8 @@ static struct task_struct
> *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
>  	 * lock again later if there is no need to push
>  	 */
>  	rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_tasks(rq);
> +
> +	cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, p == NULL ? MAX_RT_PRIO : p->prio);
>  #endif
> 
>  	return p;
> @@ -1673,6 +1675,8 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p)
>  {
>  	int check_resched = 1;
> 
> +	if (!p->on_rq)
> +		return;
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are already running, then there's nothing
>  	 * that needs to be done. But if we are not running
> @@ -1680,7 +1684,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p)
>  	 * If that current running task is also an RT task
>  	 * then see if we can move to another run queue.
>  	 */
> -	if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) {
> +	if (rq->curr != p) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  		if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) &&
>  		    /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
> @@ -1690,6 +1694,11 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq,
> struct task_struct *p)
>  		if (check_resched && p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
>  			resched_task(rq->curr);
>  	}
> +	else {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +		cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, p->prio);
> +#endif
> +	}
>  }
> 
>  /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ