[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1106171845480.20321@sister.anvils>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
cc: akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > And regardless of the patch path that is taken, update test(s) if
> > applicable.
Thanks for the links, Randy, I hadn't thought of those at all.
> > I thought that someone from Red Hat had a kernel loadable
> > module for testing radix-tree -- or maybe that was for rbtree (?) --
> > but I can't find that just now.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/radix-tree/
This one just tests that radix_tree_preload() goes deep enough:
not affected by the little change I've made.
> > And one Andrew Morton has a userspace radix tree test harness at
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/rtth.tar.gz
This should still be as relevant as it was before, but I notice its
radix_tree.c is almost identical to the source currently in the kernel
tree, so I ought at the least to keep it in synch.
Whether there's anything suitable for testing here in the changes that
I've made, I'll have to look into later.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists