[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110618111934.26203dbf@neptune.home>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:19:34 +0200
From: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
francis.moro@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...driva.com.br>,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fb: avoid possible deadlock caused by fb_set_suspend
Guennadi, could you have a look at (completely untested) patch which avoids
possible deadlock due to inverted lock taking order on hotplug as well
as "readding" lock_fb_info() for fb_set_suspend() call after Herton's
patch to fb_set_suspend().
Thanks,
Bruno
On Sat, 18 June 2011 Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 June 2011 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de> wrote:
> > From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...driva.com.br>
> >
> > A lock ordering issue can cause deadlocks: in framebuffer/console code,
> > all needed struct fb_info locks are taken before acquire_console_sem(),
> > in places which need to take console semaphore.
> >
> > But fb_set_suspend is always called with console semaphore held, and
> > inside it we call lock_fb_info which gets the fb_info lock, inverse
> > locking order of what the rest of the code does. This causes a real
> > deadlock issue, when we write to state fb sysfs attribute (which calls
> > fb_set_suspend) while a framebuffer is being unregistered by
> > remove_conflicting_framebuffers, as can be shown by following show
> > blocked state trace on a test program which loads i915 and runs another
> > forked processes writing to state attribute:
> >
> > Test process with semaphore held and trying to get fb_info lock:
>
> ...
>
> > fb-test2 which reproduces above is available on kernel.org bug #26232.
> > To solve this issue, avoid calling lock_fb_info inside fb_set_suspend,
> > and move it out to where needed (callers of fb_set_suspend must call
> > lock_fb_info before if needed). So far, the only place which needs to
> > call lock_fb_info is store_fbstate, all other places which calls
> > fb_set_suspend are suspend/resume hooks that should not need the lock as
> > they should be run only when processes are already frozen in
> > suspend/resume.
>
> From a quick look through FB drivers in 2.6.39 I've found one that would need
> more work:
> - drivers/video/sh_mobile_hdmi.c: sh_hdmi_edid_work_fn()
> Should get changed to
> a) right locking order in case (hdmi->hp_state == HDMI_HOTPLUG_CONNECTED)
> b) lock fb_info in the other case
> For this one fb_set_suspend() does get call in a hotplug worker,
> thus independently on suspend/resume process.
>
> The rest does match the suspend/resume hook pattern mentioned.
>
> Bruno
>
>
> > References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26232
> > Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...driva.com.br>
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/video/fbmem.c | 3 ---
> > drivers/video/fbsysfs.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> > index 5aac00e..ad93629 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> > @@ -1738,8 +1738,6 @@ void fb_set_suspend(struct fb_info *info, int state)
> > {
> > struct fb_event event;
> >
> > - if (!lock_fb_info(info))
> > - return;
> > event.info = info;
> > if (state) {
> > fb_notifier_call_chain(FB_EVENT_SUSPEND, &event);
> > @@ -1748,7 +1746,6 @@ void fb_set_suspend(struct fb_info *info, int state)
> > info->state = FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING;
> > fb_notifier_call_chain(FB_EVENT_RESUME, &event);
> > }
> > - unlock_fb_info(info);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> > index 04251ce..67afa9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> > @@ -399,9 +399,12 @@ static ssize_t store_fbstate(struct device *device,
> >
> > state = simple_strtoul(buf, &last, 0);
> >
> > + if (!lock_fb_info(fb_info))
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > console_lock();
> > fb_set_suspend(fb_info, (int)state);
> > console_unlock();
> > + unlock_fb_info(fb_info);
> >
> > return count;
> > }
diff --git a/drivers/video/sh_mobile_hdmi.c b/drivers/video/sh_mobile_hdmi.c
index 2b9e56a..b1a13ab 100644
--- a/drivers/video/sh_mobile_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/video/sh_mobile_hdmi.c
@@ -1151,27 +1151,27 @@ static void sh_hdmi_edid_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
ch = info->par;
- console_lock();
+ if (lock_fb_info(info)) {
+ console_lock();
- /* HDMI plug in */
- if (!sh_hdmi_must_reconfigure(hdmi) &&
- info->state == FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING) {
- /*
- * First activation with the default monitor - just turn
- * on, if we run a resume here, the logo disappears
- */
- if (lock_fb_info(info)) {
+ /* HDMI plug in */
+ if (!sh_hdmi_must_reconfigure(hdmi) &&
+ info->state == FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING) {
+ /*
+ * First activation with the default monitor - just turn
+ * on, if we run a resume here, the logo disappears
+ */
info->var.width = hdmi->var.width;
info->var.height = hdmi->var.height;
sh_hdmi_display_on(hdmi, info);
- unlock_fb_info(info);
+ } else {
+ /* New monitor or have to wake up */
+ fb_set_suspend(info, 0);
}
- } else {
- /* New monitor or have to wake up */
- fb_set_suspend(info, 0);
- }
- console_unlock();
+ console_unlock();
+ unlock_fb_info(info);
+ }
} else {
ret = 0;
if (!hdmi->info)
@@ -1181,12 +1181,15 @@ static void sh_hdmi_edid_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
fb_destroy_modedb(hdmi->monspec.modedb);
hdmi->monspec.modedb = NULL;
- console_lock();
+ if (lock_fb_info(info)) {
+ console_lock();
- /* HDMI disconnect */
- fb_set_suspend(hdmi->info, 1);
+ /* HDMI disconnect */
+ fb_set_suspend(hdmi->info, 1);
- console_unlock();
+ console_unlock();
+ unlock_fb_info(info);
+ }
pm_runtime_put(hdmi->dev);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists