[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110618145724.GB18190@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 07:57:25 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lopez Cruz, Misael" <misael.lopez@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support
for TWL6040 vibrator
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:59:47PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2011 11:43:32 Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Just use the default params
> >
> > alloc_workqueue("twl6040-vibra", 0, 0);
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I'll do this for the next posting
>
Tejun,
For my education, what is the benefit of creating a dedicated workqueue
with alloc_workqueue (which, as far as I understand, does not end up
having dedicated worker threads but will use the common pool) and simply
queueing the jobs on system-wide workqueue?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists