[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DFE31DC.4080201@teksavvy.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:29:00 -0400
From: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10 v2] Generic Watchdog Timer Driver
On 11-06-19 10:19 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Then you'd need an additional interface to specify which watchdog as soon
>>> as we support multiple watchdogs.
>>
>> You can always have multiple ways of setting nowayout -- hardware requirements,
>> global module option, local module option, and a new ioctl command -- but
>> what is being used is then the logical OR of all of them.
>
> An ioctl for it would make a lot of sense as watchdogs are often compiled
> in so currently there isn't a good way to runtime set this.
I wouldn't mind a kernel parameter to enable a hardware watchdog timer at boot.
Currently, there's a window at startup where the watchdog is not enabled,
and the system could lock up and die in there without it being triggered.
Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists