[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201106191325.17181.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:25:17 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10 v2] Generic Watchdog Timer Driver
On Sunday 19 June 2011 12:03:28 Alan Cox wrote:
> > > /* Register the watchdog timer device */
> > > res = watchdog_register_device(&wdt_dev);
> >
> > Why is this a feature of the individual drivers and not of the core?
>
> It's a hardware dependant feature - some watchdogs cannot be stopped once
> initialized.
Ah, I see. OTOH, 80 of the 107 watchdogs in the kernel do provide it as a
module option, which indicates that there is some room for consolidation,
even if it might not be appropriate for every one of them.
> > Maybe it can be in both, so existing drivers don't need to change the user
> > interface, but new drivers don't have to provide the option individually
> > when you can simply set it for the base module.
>
> Then you'd need an additional interface to specify which watchdog as soon
> as we support multiple watchdogs.
You can always have multiple ways of setting nowayout -- hardware requirements,
global module option, local module option, and a new ioctl command -- but
what is being used is then the logical OR of all of them.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists