lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1308575540-25219-5-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:12:10 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context

This is needed to allow network softirq packet processing to make use
of PF_MEMALLOC.

Currently softirq context cannot use PF_MEMALLOC due to it not being
associated with a task, and therefore not having task flags to fiddle with -
thus the gfp to alloc flag mapping ignores the task flags when in interrupts
(hard or soft) context.

Allowing softirqs to make use of PF_MEMALLOC therefore requires some trickery.
We basically borrow the task flags from whatever process happens to be
preempted by the softirq.

So we modify the gfp to alloc flags mapping to not exclude task flags in
softirq context, and modify the softirq code to save, clear and restore
the PF_MEMALLOC flag.

The save and clear, ensures the preempted task's PF_MEMALLOC flag doesn't
leak into the softirq. The restore ensures a softirq's PF_MEMALLOC flag
cannot leak back into the preempted process.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    7 +++++++
 kernel/softirq.c      |    3 +++
 mm/page_alloc.c       |    5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index a837b20..7089cf1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1841,6 +1841,13 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
 
 #endif
 
+static inline void tsk_restore_flags(struct task_struct *p,
+				     unsigned long pflags, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	p->flags &= ~mask;
+	p->flags |= pflags & mask;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 extern void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
 			       const struct cpumask *new_mask);
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 1396017..2817c27 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 	__u32 pending;
 	int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART;
 	int cpu;
+	unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
+	current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
 	account_system_vtime(current);
@@ -265,6 +267,7 @@ restart:
 
 	account_system_vtime(current);
 	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
+	tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
 }
 
 #ifndef __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 27043e7..4e19606 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2046,7 +2046,10 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	if (likely(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))) {
 		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_MEMALLOC)
 			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
-		else if (likely(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) && !in_interrupt())
+		else if (!in_irq() && (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
+			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
+		else if (!in_interrupt() &&
+				unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
 			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ