[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1106201521250.2142@xanadu.home>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,
aligned(4) instead of removing the packed attribute
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:58:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > We are also going to change the ARM implementation to always do 32 bit
> > accesses in readl/writel, but the patch that went into the ehci driver
> > was correct nonetheless.
>
> Not without someone doing a comparitively large amount of work to analyze
> the effect of any change there and make sure that it doesn't have a
> negative impact to drivers.
This thread prompted me to investigate a bit. I have vague memories for
the reasons why we decided to use plain C for the IO accessors as the
inline assembly version didn't produce nearly the same code quality. It
seems that GCC improved quite a bit there, and from a quick
investigation, it looks like comparable code is being generated with the
C and the inline asm versions with a recent enough GCC. This is
certainly the case with the version causing issues with packed
structures.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists