linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cfq: Remove special treatment for metadata rqs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:03:34 -0700
From:	Justin TerAvest <teravest@...gle.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq: Remove special treatment for metadata rqs.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> On 2011-06-20 21:52, Justin TerAvest wrote:
>> There is no consistency among filesystems from what bios (or requests)
>> are marked as being metadata. It's interesting to expose this in traces,
>> but we shouldn't schedule the requests differently based on whether or
>> not they're marked as being metadata.
>
> Agree, we should kill that. What is this patch against? cfq_choose_req()
> also has a "choose meta over non-meta" preference.

This is against for-3.1. Let me know if you want it against something else.

Sorry, I missed the preference in cfq_choose_req, since it changed to
be clever about bit operations. I'll send a v2 patch that cleans that
use up as well.

>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/