[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1106201704340.2113-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,aligned(4) instead of removing
the packed attribute
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2011 20:39:02 Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Alexander Holler wrote:
> >
> > > I see it that way: packed is needed to be sure that at least for struct
> > > ehci_regs there are no padding bytes inbetween the members.
> >
> > But is it really needed?
>
> No. When the structure is marked packed, it's broken because it relies
> on undefined behavior. If it's not packed, there is no problem.
>
> > > It might
> > > work without, but that depends on the compiler (-version, architecture,
> > > whatever).
> >
> > Have there ever been any combinations of compiler, version,
> > architecture, whatever, that had unwanted padding bytes in this
> > structure?
>
> Only on compilers that are not able to build Linux kernels anyway.
Just as I thought. There's no reason to accept the proposed patch;
we're fine the way we are now.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists