lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:31:31 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	drepper@...adia.org
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, wilsons@...rt.ca,
	linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add cloexec information to fdinfo

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:55:08 -0400
drepper@...adia.org wrote:

> There is one piece of information about a file descriptor which is
> currently not visible from the outside: the close-on-exec flag.  The
> /proc/PID/fdinfo/* files have the mode information but this is
> missing.  Is the following patch acceptable?
> 
> What I don't know is whether the RCU locking is needed given that
> real locks are taken.  Someone with more knowledge could just
> remove those two lines.

The locking looks OK to me.

Hopefully /prod/pid/fdinfo is documented somewhere. 
linux-man@...r.kernel.org appears to be the email address we use to rub
the documentation lamp.

> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 14def99..bda3651 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1924,12 +1924,23 @@ static int proc_fd_info(struct inode *inode, struct path *path, char *info)
>  				*path = file->f_path;
>  				path_get(&file->f_path);
>  			}
> -			if (info)
> +			if (info) {
> +				int cloexec;
> +				struct fdtable *fdt;
> +
> +				rcu_read_lock();
> +				fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> +				cloexec = FD_ISSET(fd, fdt->close_on_exec);

Does FD_ISSET return 0 or 1?  Or 0 or non-zero?

For x86 it's the former.

<checks the architectures>

arch/h8300/include/asm/posix_types.h: busted
#define __FD_ISSET(d, set)      ((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d))

arch/m68k/include/asm/posix_types.h: busted
#define __FD_ISSET(d, set)      ((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d))

arch/xtensa/include/asm/posix_types.h: busted
#define __FD_ISSET(d, set)      ((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d))


From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>

Harmonise these return values with other architectures.  In some cases
this affects all compilers and in other cases non-gcc compilers only.

Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 arch/h8300/include/asm/posix_types.h  |    2 +-
 arch/m68k/include/asm/posix_types.h   |    2 +-
 arch/xtensa/include/asm/posix_types.h |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/h8300/include/asm/posix_types.h~h8300-m68k-xtensa-__fd_isset-should-return-0-1 arch/h8300/include/asm/posix_types.h
--- a/arch/h8300/include/asm/posix_types.h~h8300-m68k-xtensa-__fd_isset-should-return-0-1
+++ a/arch/h8300/include/asm/posix_types.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ typedef struct {
 #define	__FD_CLR(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] &= ~__FDMASK(d))
 
 #undef	__FD_ISSET
-#define	__FD_ISSET(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d))
+#define	__FD_ISSET(d, set)	(!!((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d)))
 
 #undef	__FD_ZERO
 #define __FD_ZERO(fdsetp) (memset (fdsetp, 0, sizeof(*(fd_set *)fdsetp)))
diff -puN arch/m68k/include/asm/posix_types.h~h8300-m68k-xtensa-__fd_isset-should-return-0-1 arch/m68k/include/asm/posix_types.h
--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/posix_types.h~h8300-m68k-xtensa-__fd_isset-should-return-0-1
+++ a/arch/m68k/include/asm/posix_types.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ typedef struct {
 #define	__FD_CLR(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] &= ~__FDMASK(d))
 
 #undef	__FD_ISSET
-#define	__FD_ISSET(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d))
+#define	__FD_ISSET(d, set)	(!!((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d)))
 
 #undef	__FD_ZERO
 #define __FD_ZERO(fdsetp) (memset (fdsetp, 0, sizeof(*(fd_set *)fdsetp)))
diff -puN arch/xtensa/include/asm/posix_types.h~h8300-m68k-xtensa-__fd_isset-should-return-0-1 arch/xtensa/include/asm/posix_types.h
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/posix_types.h~h8300-m68k-xtensa-__fd_isset-should-return-0-1
+++ a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/posix_types.h
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ typedef struct {
 
 #define	__FD_SET(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] |= __FDMASK(d))
 #define	__FD_CLR(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] &= ~__FDMASK(d))
-#define	__FD_ISSET(d, set)	((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d))
+#define	__FD_ISSET(d, set)	(!!((set)->fds_bits[__FDELT(d)] & __FDMASK(d)))
 #define	__FD_ZERO(set)	\
   ((void) memset ((void *) (set), 0, sizeof (__kernel_fd_set)))
 
_


> +				rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  				snprintf(info, PROC_FDINFO_MAX,
>  					 "pos:\t%lli\n"
> -					 "flags:\t0%o\n",
> +					 "flags:\t0%o\n"
> +					 "cloexec: %d\n",

Should use a tab here for consistency.

--- a/fs/proc/base.c~proc-pid-fdinfo-add-cloexec-information-fix
+++ a/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ static int proc_fd_info(struct inode *in
 				snprintf(info, PROC_FDINFO_MAX,
 					 "pos:\t%lli\n"
 					 "flags:\t0%o\n"
-					 "cloexec: %d\n",
+					 "cloexec:\t%d\n",
 					 (long long) file->f_pos,
 					 file->f_flags,
 					 cloexec);
_

>  					 (long long) file->f_pos,
> -					 file->f_flags);
> +					 file->f_flags,
> +					 cloexec);
> +			}
>  			spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
>  			put_files_struct(files);
>  			return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ