linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: omap: fix the crash during omap ehci or ohci driver initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:06:01 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Keshava Munegowda <keshava_mgowda@...com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gadiyar@...com, parthab@...ia.ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: omap: fix the crash during omap ehci or ohci driver initialization

Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> writes:

> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:28:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:12:19PM +0530, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
>> > > From: Keshava Munegowda <Keshava_mgowda@...com>
>> > > 
>> > > Oops are produced during initialization of ehci and ohci
>> > > drivers. This is because the run time pm apis are used by
>> > > the driver but the corresponding hwmod structures and
>> > > initialization is not merged. 
>> > You mean they're currently checked in a different tree ? Is that a
>> > public one?
>> 
>> it was supposed to go via linux-omap tree but the patches got lost in
>> the limbo :-(
> Then shouldn't those patches be the ones to be sent to Linus as a fix for 3.0 ?

If they were ready, maybe.  But those patches still need important work
(and review) and are not "fix" material but need to wait until the next
merge window.

Basically, the original patch should not have been submitted to mainline
until the runtime PM support was ready, so the correct short term fix is
to simply revert.

Also, to echo the question from Dima Zavin:

Why isn't this just a simple revert of the original patch?

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/