[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110620221642.GD2933@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:16:42 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.0-rc3] tree RCU boost vs hang notifier...
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:44:02AM +0000, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:40:48 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:46:04PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >> Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
> >
> > Thank you very much for testing this!
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Will this also fix the constant system load of 1.0 or is this a different
> issue? (If it was, I'd need to report it properly ;)
Hello, Stefan,
Yes, it should also reduce the system load, given that the load
calculations count tasks sleeping uninteruptably but not tasks
sleeping interruptably.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists