[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6167.1308530628@jrobl>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:43:48 +0900
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...onical.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
jordipujolp@...il.com, ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion
Michal Suchanek:
> Is there any reason why a directory cannot be whiteout?
Just to reduce consuming inodes.
> It may possibly hide a XXXXXXXX file if it is later added to the lower layer.
No, because it is "doubly" whiteouted.
> Just as whiteout has totally different file-type from a file. It's
> specific to the union.
Ok, we are talking about different whiteouts.
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists