[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DFE9850.7030400@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:46:08 +1000
From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Enhance /dev/mem to allow read/write of arbitrary
physical addresses
On 20/06/11 10:42, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:02:17AM +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> There are drivers where this makes sense. For example an FPGA device
>> with a proprietary register layout on the memory bus can be done this
>> way. The FPGA can simply be mapped in user-space via /dev/mem and
>> handled there. If the device requires no access other than memory bus
>> reads and writes then writing a custom char device driver just to get an
>> mmap function seems a bit overkill.
> Calling a 30 line device driver "overkill" might in itself be overkill?
>
I mean overkill in the sense of having to write the driver at all. Why
write a 30 line driver just to re-implement some functionality of /dev/mem?
~Ryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists