[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110620074124.GB24716@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:41:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Enhance /dev/mem to allow read/write of arbitrary
physical addresses
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> There are some test drivers which really want /dev/mem to work.
Test drivers and test hardware with zero enumeration can use below 4G
addresses just fine.
Also, debugging is not an issue and some non-default kernel or boot
option can enable any sort of device i guess, so my main worry isnt
really security but that we should stand in the way of the apparent
practice of *shipping* user-space drivers that use /dev/mem ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists