[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinDM8_vaevEtJa++hAu5JOEOYhwsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:24:15 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ptrace: kill clone/exec tracehooks
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>> + if (likely(user_mode(regs)) && !(clone_flags & CLONE_UNTRACED)) {
>
> Off-topic, but I never understood this user_mode() check... OK, a
> traced task can call kernel_thread() in kernel, but this used
> CLONE_UNTRACED.
Me neither. I suppose it's added as a safety net. Maybe we can turn
it into WARN_ON(!user_mode) && !CLONE_UNTRACED) but just leaving it
alone doesn't sound like a bad idea.
>> + if (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK)
>> + trace = PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK;
>> + else if ((clone_flags & CSIGNAL) != SIGCHLD)
>> + trace = PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE;
>> + else
>> + trace = PTRACE_EVENT_FORK;
>> +
>> + if (likely(!ptrace_event_enabled(current, trace)))
>> + trace = 0;
>> + }
>
> As I said am going to apply this all except 6/7, but imho this
> deserves a trivial helper anyway.
Yeah, maybe. Preference, I guess.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists