linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: make cardbus-bridge resources nice-to-have

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110621075659.GA4620@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:57:00 +0200
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc:	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, svenkatr@...com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	cjb@...top.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: make cardbus-bridge resources nice-to-have

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:47:17PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> Allocate resources to cardbus bridge only after all other genuine
> resources requests are satisfied. Dont retry if resource allocation
> for cardbus-bridge fails.

Well, for those who use cardbus cards, cardbus resources aren't "nice to
have", they are absolutely required. Of course, not all cardbus cards need
as many resources as are currently assigned, so I wouldn't oppose a patch
which marks _some_ of the currently assigned resources as "nice to have".
But this approach -- 0 required, all "nice to have" -- seems wrong to me.

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/