linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E006FA0.7050508@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:47:04 +0530
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.

On 6/21/2011 3:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:38:34PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> On 6/20/2011 8:24 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2011 7:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> So, as loops_per_jiffy is not local to this function, the compiler has
>>>> to write out that zero value, before calling calibrate_delay_converge(),
>>>> and loops_per_jiffy only becomes non-zero _after_
>>>> calibrate_delay_converge()
>>>> has returned. This opens the window and allows the spinlock debugging
>>>> code to explode.
>>>>
>>>> This patch closes the window completely, by only writing to
>>>> loops_per_jiffy
>>>> only when we have a real value for it.
>>>>
>>>> This allows me to boot 3.0.0-rc3 on Versatile Express (4 CPU) whereas
>>>> without this it fails with spinlock lockup and rcu problems.
>>>>
>>>> init/calibrate.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> I am away from my board now. Will test this change.
>> Have tested your change and it seems to fix the crash I
>> was observing. Are you planning to send this fix for rc5?
>
> Yes.  I think sending CPUs into infinite loops in the spinlock code is
> definitely sufficiently serious that it needs to go to Linus ASAP.
> It'd be nice to have a tested-by line though.
>
Sure.

>>> btw, the online-active race is still open even with this patch close
>>> and should be fixed.
>>>
>> The only problem remains is waiting for active mask before
>> marking CPU online. Shall I refresh my patch with only
>> this change then ?
>
> I already have that as a separate change.
Can you point me to both of these commits so that I have
them in my tree for testing.

Thanks for help.

Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/