[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110621104357.GE22177@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:43:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
dg77.kim@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] Samsung SoC ADC: use regulator (VDD for ADC).
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:58:43AM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> + ret = regulator_enable(adc->vdd);
> + if (!ret)
> + goto err_ioremap;
> +
This test looks the wrong way round? regulator_enable() should return 0
on success but this will treat that as an error.
> static int s3c_adc_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct adc_device *adc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int ret;
>
> + ret = regulator_enable(adc->vdd);
> clk_enable(adc->clk);
> enable_irq(adc->irq);
>
> writel(adc->prescale | S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCEN,
> adc->regs + S3C2410_ADCCON);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
Seems better to return as soon as we notice the error, no point in
starting anything else up if we don't have power.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists