linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Max98095: Fix logging of hardware revision.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110621115547.GD25032@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:55:47 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Peter Hsiang <Peter.Hsiang@...im-ic.com>
Cc:	Taylor Hutt <thutt@...omium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Max98095: Fix logging of hardware
	revision.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:10:39AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:43:58PM -0700, Peter Hsiang wrote:

> > I checked with hardware engineering and was told 0x40=RevA, 0x41=RevB..

> > Would a raw value or the use of a 0x3F bit mask be more acceptable?

> I don't mind (though it does seem like the high bit isn't part of the
> actual data), it was just that it's a common error to assume that die
> revisions and package revisions correspond directly.

This means if you're OK with it I can apply the patch as-is, BTW.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/