linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/8] Introducing a generic AMP/IPC framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:54:35 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	davinci-linux-open-source 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Introducing a generic AMP/IPC framework

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> Hi Ohad,
>
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>
>> This patch set adds a generic AMP/IPC framework which makes it possible to
>> control (power on, boot, power off) and communicate (simply send and receive
>> messages) with those remote processors.
>
> This looks really nice overall, but I don't currently have time for a
> more in-depth review. My feeling is that you are definitely on the right
> track here, and the plans you list as TODO to continue are all good.

Second that.  I'm happy to see the shift over to virtio, I think that
is the right direction overall.  I'll try to carve out some time for a
detailed review.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/