[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110622071112.GB2985@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:41:12 +0530
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/16] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their
local runtime
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:16:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> @@ -1505,7 +1559,17 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
> break;
> cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq
> + *
> + * note: in the case of encountering a throttled cfs_rq we will
> + * post the final h_nr_running decrement below.
You mean 'final h_nr_running increment' I suppose ?
> + */
> + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
> + break;
> cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
> +
> flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
> }
>
> @@ -1513,11 +1577,15 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
> cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
Regards,
Bharata.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists