linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pch_gpio: Support interrupt function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201106221115.31885.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:31 +0200
From:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
To:	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com,
	yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
	kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, toshiharu-linux@....okisemi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pch_gpio: Support interrupt function

On Wednesday 22 June 2011 10:14:10 Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> (2011/06/22 15:28), Alexander Stein wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 02:10:28 Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> >> (2011/06/21 18:10), Alexander Stein wrote:
> >>> I wrote a small program which use poll(2) on value, after edge hase
> >>> been configured from shell. I cannot test the edge detection
> >>> appropriately due to debouncing using jumpers.
> >> 
> >> Really ?
> >> In out test environment, my test program could detect edge interrupt
> >> correctly.
> > 
> > My test program used poll/select on edge successfully. But I could not
> > test the raising or falling feature actually, as my input is bouncing.
> > So, it doesn't matter if I set both/raising/falling in edge, due to my
> > inputs the effect is the same. Any input event will end in several
> > raising and falling interrupts events.
> > I hope I could make this more clear.
> 
> Our test program also uses poll (We don't use select().)

I noticed poll/select work nearly as the same. Both worked fine here.

> BTW, is the above your saying related to your patch "[PATCH] pch_gpio:
> transform mutex into spinlock" ?

Should be unrelated. I did the GPIO interrupt test before stumbling on the 
mutex/spinlock problem. The latter one was caused by setting a GPIO from 
interrupt context (in a different driver).

Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/