[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110622004608.GS25383@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:46:08 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Nai Xia <nai.xia@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid
volatile pages scanning
* Nai Xia (nai.xia@...il.com) wrote:
> Compared to the first version, this patch set addresses the problem of
> dirty bit updating of virtual machines, by adding two mmu_notifier interfaces.
> So it can now track the volatile working set inside KVM guest OS.
>
> V1 log:
> Currently, ksm uses page checksum to detect volatile pages. Izik Eidus
> suggested that we could use pte dirty bit to optimize. This patch series
> adds this new logic.
>
> Preliminary benchmarks show that the scan speed is improved by up to 16
> times on volatile transparent huge pages and up to 8 times on volatile
> regular pages.
Did you run this only in the host (which would not trigger the notifiers
to kvm), or also run your test program in a guest?
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists