[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E01BE6B.2090701@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:05:31 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/16] CFS Bandwidth Control v7
(2011/06/21 16:16), Paul Turner wrote:
> Hideotoshi, the following patches changed enough, or are new, and should be
> looked over again before I can re-add your Reviewed-by.
>
> [patch 04/16] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies
> [patch 06/16] sched: add a timer to handle CFS bandwidth refresh
> [patch 07/16] sched: expire invalid runtime
> [patch 10/16] sched: throttle entities exceeding their allowed bandwidth
> [patch 15/16] sched: return unused runtime on voluntary sleep
Done.
Thank you very much again for your great work!
I'll continue my test/benchmark on this v7 for a while.
Though I believe no more bug is there, I'll let you know if there is something.
I think it's about time to have this set in upstream branch (at first, tip:sched/???).
(How about having an update with correct words (say, v7.1?) within a few days?)
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists