linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:43:30 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	nai.xia@...il.com
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte
 and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking

On 06/21/2011 04:32 PM, Nai Xia wrote:
> Introduced kvm_mmu_notifier_test_and_clear_dirty(), kvm_mmu_notifier_dirty_update()
> and their mmu_notifier interfaces to support KSM dirty bit tracking, which brings
> significant performance gain in volatile pages scanning in KSM.
> Currently, kvm_mmu_notifier_dirty_update() returns 0 if and only if intel EPT is
> enabled to indicate that the dirty bits of underlying sptes are not updated by
> hardware.
>


Can you quantify the performance gains?

> +int kvm_test_and_clear_dirty_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
> +				   unsigned long data)
> +{
> +	u64 *spte;
> +	int dirty = 0;
> +
> +	if (!shadow_dirty_mask) {
> +		WARN(1, "KVM: do NOT try to test dirty bit in EPT\n");
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
> +	while (spte) {
> +		int _dirty;
> +		u64 _spte = *spte;
> +		BUG_ON(!(_spte&  PT_PRESENT_MASK));
> +		_dirty = _spte&  PT_DIRTY_MASK;
> +		if (_dirty) {
> +			dirty = 1;
> +			clear_bit(PT_DIRTY_SHIFT, (unsigned long *)spte);
> +		}

Racy.  Also, needs a tlb flush eventually.

> +		spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
> +	}
> +out:
> +	return dirty;
> +}
> +
>   #define RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD 1000
>
>
>   struct mmu_notifier_ops {
> +	int (*dirty_update)(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> +			     struct mm_struct *mm);
> +

I prefer to have test_and_clear_dirty() always return 1 in this case (if 
the spte is writeable), and drop this callback.
> +int __mmu_notifier_dirty_update(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	struct mmu_notifier *mn;
> +	struct hlist_node *n;
> +	int dirty_update = 0;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n,&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
> +		if (mn->ops->dirty_update)
> +			dirty_update |= mn->ops->dirty_update(mn, mm);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +

Should it not be &= instead?

> +	return dirty_update;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * This function can't run concurrently against mmu_notifier_register
>    * because mm->mm_users>  0 during mmu_notifier_register and exit_mmap

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/