lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E01C7D5.3060603@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:45:41 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, caiqian@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
	hughd@...gle.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	minchan.kim@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com
CC:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6]  Fix oom killer doesn't work at all if system have
 > gigabytes memory  (aka CAI founded issue)

CAI Qian reported current oom logic doesn't work at all on his 16GB RAM
machine. oom killer killed all system daemon at first and his system
stopped responding.

The brief log is below.

> > Out of memory: Kill process 1175 (dhclient) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1247 (rsyslogd) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1284 (irqbalance) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1303 (rpcbind) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1321 (rpc.statd) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1333 (mdadm) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1365 (rpc.idmapd) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1403 (dbus-daemon) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1438 (acpid) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1447 (hald) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1447 (hald) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1487 (hald-addon-inpu) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1488 (hald-addon-acpi) score 1 or sacrifice child
> > Out of memory: Kill process 1507 (automount) score 1 or sacrifice child

The problems are three.

1) if two processes have the same oom score, we should kill younger process.
but current logic kill older. Typically oldest processes are system daemons.
2) Current logic use 'unsigned int' for internal score calculation. (exactly says,
it only use 0-1000 value). its very low precision calculation makes a lot of
same oom score and kill an ineligible process.
3) Current logic give 3% of SystemRAM to root processes. It obviously too big
if you have plenty memory. Now, your fork-bomb processes have 500MB OOM immune
bonus. then your fork-bomb never ever be killed.

Changes from v2
 o added [patch 1/5] use euid instead of CAP_SYS_ADMIN


KOSAKI Motohiro (6):
  oom: use euid instead of CAP_SYS_ADMIN for protection root process
  oom: improve dump_tasks() show items
  oom: kill younger process first
  oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-ram internally
  oom: don't kill random process
  oom: merge oom_kill_process() with oom_kill_task()

 fs/proc/base.c        |   13 ++-
 include/linux/oom.h   |    5 +-
 include/linux/sched.h |   11 +++
 mm/oom_kill.c         |  201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.3.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ